Legal Opinion

Sheriff, Humboldt County v. Acuna

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1991No. 21507PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Steffen, J.:

Respondent Raul Acuna allegedly sold cocaine to an individual who was motivated by his own criminal involvement with the law to cooperate with the police. The alleged transaction was monitored electronically and Acuna was arrested and charged with selling a controlled substance. After a preliminary hearing, Acuna filed a pretrial petition for a writ of habeas corpus based upon an asserted violation of this court’s holding in Franklin v. State, 94 Nev. 220, 577 P.2d 860 (1978). The district court agreed that Franklin was dispositive and issued the writ. Having…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. United States v. Kevin R. DaileyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  3. People v. MedinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. United States v. Burton A. LibrachCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  5. Franklin v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. BoldenTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. CookArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. FisherArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  5. People v. BannisterIllinois Supreme Court · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API