Legal Opinion

Franklin v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1978No. 9601PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*221OPINION

By the Court,

Gunderson, J.:

On appeal, appellant Joanne Franklin (formerly Wellman) raises eleven issues, one of which impels us to order a new trial, to-wit:

Are the due process rights of a defendant on trial offended, when the prosecutor not only plea bargains to obtain inculpatory testimony from a purported accomplice, by allowing him to plead guilty to a reduced charge, but also withholds the fruits of the bargain and continues the threat of full prosecution in order to assure testimony in accord with the prosecutor’s vision of truth?

In such circumstances, we think, a defendant is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. FordSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. People v. MedinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. People v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. LaPena v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Foster v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  2. People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. People v. RielCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. People v. DeSantisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State Bar of Nevada v. ClaiborneNevada Supreme Court · 1988

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API