Legal Opinion
Tower v. Camp
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 30, 1925PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKeeler, J.
Certain of the reasons of appeal are general and are all in effect that the defendants were not negligent and that judgment should have been the other way. The ninth reason of appeal, concerned with a statement of fact in the memorandum of decision, is not before us, unless we comply with defend ants’ request and correct the finding by placing it therein. We see no reason for so doing. The facts upon which the court rested its decision are fully set forth in the finding and cover fully the factual matter recited in the memorandum. Regarding the tenth assignment of error, which is directed to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Shea v. HemmingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Sullivan v. KrivitskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
- Morris v. Winchester Repeating Arms Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bushnell v. BushnellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
- Biro v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Montanaro Brothers Builders, Inc. v. SnowConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Hester v. Coliseum Motor Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1930
- Harris Calorific Sales Co. v. Manifold Systems, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.