Legal Opinion
City of Sequim v. Malkasian
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 30, 2003No. 22922-6-IIPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
79 P.3d 24 (2003)
CITY OF SEQUIM, a Noncharter Code City and a Municipal Corporation of the State of Washington, by and through its City Council, Appellant,
v.
Paul MALKASIAN, Circulator, Sponsor and Presenter of an Initiative and a Referendum Petition to the Sequim City Council, Respondent.
No. 22922-6-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
November 12, 2003.
As Amended December 30, 2003.
Craig Andrew Ritchie, Port Angeles, WA, for Respondent.
Peter J. Eglick, Helsell Fetterman LLP, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.
MORGAN, J.
After an election in which a city's voters approve an initiative, thus…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- GTE Sylvania, Inc. v. Consumers Union of the United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Lord v. VeazieSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- Bowles v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of Sequim v. MalkasianWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- City of Sequim v. MalkasianWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- Las Vegas Convention & Visitors Authority v. MillerNevada Supreme Court · 2008
- Berent v. City of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
- City of Sequim v. MalkasianWashington Supreme Court · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.