State v. Smith
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Justice.
DEFENDANT JOSEPH SMITH’S APPEAL
This defendant’s sole assignment of error is that the trial court committed prejudicial error in denying his motion for a mistrial after striking the testimony of several witnesses. We find no merit in the assignment.
The evidence which the court ordered stricken did not directly involve either defendant. It tended to show that no fingerprints were found at the murder scene which matched those of any of the four participants and that those persons who entered the crime scene after the robbery-murder, but before the police arrived, had no traces of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. PartlowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. StokesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. LawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. CraigSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.