Legal Opinion

Bennett, Patsy F. v. Chertoff, Michael

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided October 18, 2005No. 04-5281PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Circuit Judge.

In Ryan v. Reno, 168 F.3d 520, 524 (D.C.Cir.1999), the court held that an adverse employment action based on the denial or revocation of a security clearance is not actionable under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2. This followed, the court concluded, from Department of Navy v. Egan, 484 U.S. 518, 108 S.Ct. 818, 98 L.Ed.2d 918 (1988), in which the Supreme Court held that the Merit Systems Protection Board lacked authority to review the substance of a decision to deny or revoke a security clearance in the course of reviewing an adverse…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Hamdi v. RumsfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Department of the Navy v. EganSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Ryan, John Clement v. Reno, JanetCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Oryszak v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
  2. Wilfred Rattigan v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
  3. Bobbi-Anne Toy v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  4. Meadows v. MukaseyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  5. Francis v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API