Neufeld v. City of Baltimore
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SPROUSE, Circuit Judge:
The question presented is whether the district court correctly abstained under the Burford doctrine1 in dismissing Leon Neufeld’s suit involving constitutional and preemption issues relating to a Baltimore City zoning ordinance regulating size and placement of television antennas. We believe the district court improperly abstained under Burford and, accordingly, reverse and remand.
I
Leon Neufeld, a Baltimore City homeowner, received three local television channels and several distant channels from a roof-mounted antenna prior to March 31, 1984. On that date, Neufeld…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Council of City of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. City of ThibodauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Thomas A. Baggett v. Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Pilot CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- MLC AUTOMOTIVE, LLC v. Town of Southern PinesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- Time Warner Cable v. DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- John D. MacDonald and Patricia MacDonald v. The Village of Northport, MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Transdulles Center, Inc. v. USX Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- Stuart Circle Parish v. Board of Zoning AppealsDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.