In the Interest of v. Johnson
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] James Dennis Lanners appeals from a Northwest Judicial District Court order denying his motion to amend a child custody judgment. Lanners argues he established a prima facie case under N.D.C.C. § 14-09-06.6(4) and the district court erred in denying him his right to an evidentiary hearing. We reverse and remand the district court’s denial of his motion to amend.
I
[¶ 2] James Lanners and Diana Johnson are the parents of a minor child born in February 1990. Douglas and Debra Thompson are the child’s maternal grandparents and present legal custodians. The maternal…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Blotske v. LeidholmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Kelly v. KellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Selzler v. SelzlerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Olson v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Delzer v. WinnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Tank v. TankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Mock v. MockNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Lagro v. LagroNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Schroeder v. SchroederNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Roberson v. RobersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.