Legal Opinion

In the Interest of v. Johnson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 2003No. 20020255PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] James Dennis Lanners appeals from a Northwest Judicial District Court order denying his motion to amend a child custody judgment. Lanners argues he established a prima facie case under N.D.C.C. § 14-09-06.6(4) and the district court erred in denying him his right to an evidentiary hearing. We reverse and remand the district court’s denial of his motion to amend.

I

[¶ 2] James Lanners and Diana Johnson are the parents of a minor child born in February 1990. Douglas and Debra Thompson are the child’s maternal grandparents and present legal custodians. The maternal…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Blotske v. LeidholmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Kelly v. KellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Selzler v. SelzlerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Olson v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Delzer v. WinnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Tank v. TankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Mock v. MockNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Lagro v. LagroNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Schroeder v. SchroederNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Roberson v. RobersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API