Legal Opinion

Mock v. Mock

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 2004No. 20030115PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Daniel Mock appeals from a district court order denying his motion to amend a child custody order. Daniel Mock argues he established a prima facie case under N.D.C.C. § 14-09-06.6. We reverse and remand, concluding the district court erred in determining Daniel Mock failed to establish a prima facie case enti-*637fling him to an evidentiary hearing under N.D.C.C. § 14-09-06.6(4).

[¶ 2] Daniel Mock and Barb Mock were divorced in August 2000. The divorce judgment, which was based upon the parties’ stipulation, provided for joint custody of the parties’ minor child. The child…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kelly v. KellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Helbling v. HelblingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Gietzen v. GietzenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Quarne v. QuarneNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Sweeney v. SweeneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Schumacker v. SchumackerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Matter of WolffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Dietz v. DietzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Lechler v. LechlerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Schroeder v. SchroederNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API