Legal Opinion

Wilson v. New Castle City

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 27, 1930No. Appeal, 136PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

The City of New Castle advertised for bids for repaving parts of three separate streets.. Taxpayers, averring the city had accepted a bid higher than the lowest, brought this bill to restrain the city from executing the contract. The court below dissolved the preliminary injunction.

The only assignment of error is to the decree. We have stated that where the final decree only is assigned, we will not go beyond the findings of fact to ascertain if the decree was justified. The evidence submitted to sustain them will not be inquired into. As a general rule, in an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hibbs v. ArensbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Lamb v. ReddingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  3. Reuting v. City of TitusvilleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  4. Newport Wharf & Lumber Co. v. DrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Day v. Amwell Township School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Conduit & Foundation Corp. v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Kratz v. AllentownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. McIntosh Road Materials Co. v. WoolworthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  4. Kennedy v. Upper Milford Township Zoning Hearing BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Brener v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API