Legal Opinion

Brener v. Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 1, 1931No. Appeal, 312PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Walling,

This is a taxpayer’s bill to enjoin the defendant City of Philadelphia and its officers, etc., from carrying out a contract for the installation of a system of fire alarm boxes. The case was heard upon bill, answer and testimony; therefrom the trial court found the facts favorable to the defendants and, from its final decree dismissing the bill of the plaintiff, Minnie Brener, she brought this appeal.

The record discloses no reversible error. In 1930 the defendant city duly advertised for bids for the fire alarm boxes and in great detail set out the required…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hibbs v. ArensbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Mazet v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  3. Mayor of Baltimore v. FlackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
  4. Kratz v. AllentownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Attorney General ex rel. Cook v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1872

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. McIntosh Road Materials Co. v. WoolworthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Fleming v. AdamsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Otter Tail Power Co. v. Village of Elbow LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  4. Sacre v. Victor L. Sacre People's Savings BankSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1947
  5. Mishkin v. Temple Beth ElSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API