Legal Opinion

Village of Kenmore v. Neiss

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 23, 1983PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law and facts, with costs, and a new trial granted. Memorandum: Plaintiff instituted this action seeking the removal of a fence erected by defendants Neiss in close proximity to the residence of their neighbors Rose and Philip Bumbaco. The village contended that the fence was in violation of a recently enacted zoning ordinance that prohibited a fence from being constructed less than three feet away from a neighbor’s residence. Defendants Neiss interposed counterclaims asserting, among other things, that there was selective enforcement of the zoning…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. People v. FriedmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. People v. GoodmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. People v. Utica Daw's Drug Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  5. People v. WalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Criscione v. City of Albany Board of Zoning AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API