Legal Opinion

Ulrich v. Kasco Abrasives Co.

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1976PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PALMORE, Justice.

The appellant, Robert Ulrich, was employed by the Marley Company as a welder. His duties included the operation of portable grinding machines. While he was operating one of these grinders the abrasive wheel or disc that had been mounted on it disintegrated, or “exploded,” as it is described. Some of the pieces of the wheel struck him in the area of the groin, causing painful and permanent injury. He brought suit against Kasco Abrasives Company, manufacturer of the wheel, and Aro Corporation, manufacturer of the grinder, under the strict liability theory. Cf. Restatement,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dealers Transport Co. v. Battery Distributing Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1966
  2. Jones v. Hutchinson Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1973
  3. Post v. American Cleaning Equipment CorporationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
  4. Hercules Powder Company v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Freund v. Cellofilm Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  2. Montgomery Elevator Co. v. McCullough Ex Rel. McCulloughKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Payne v. Soft Sheen Products, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Olson v. Prosoco, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  5. Nichols Ex Rel. Nichols v. Union Underwear Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1980

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API