Legal Opinion

Christiansen v. County of Douglas

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 2014No. S-13-689, S-13-691Published

1Opinion of the Court

Nebraska Advance Sheets 564 288 NEBRASKA REPORTS serious crime victims who do not have the attachment remedy. Similarly, there is no substantial difference between the public employees subject to the remedy and those who commit many other serious crimes yet retain their privilege from attachment. Accordingly, the Legislature’s preferential treatment of the favored groups and exclusion of others that are similar in cir- cumstance runs afoul of the Constitution’s prohibition against special legislation. Affirmed. Wright and Cassel, JJ., not participating. Sam Christiansen, an individual,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Commerce Savings Scottsbluff, Inc. v. F.H. Schafer Elevator, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Livingston v. Metropolitan Utilities DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Baxter v. National Mortgage Loan Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Burns v. NielsenNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Hall v. County of LancasterNebraska Supreme Court · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API