Legal Opinion

Hall v. County of Lancaster

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 2014No. S-13-724PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nebraska Advance Sheets HALL v. COUNTY OF LANCASTER 969 Cite as

287 Neb. 969

it deems just.24 Because there is no issue of fact and the City is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, we determine the controversy accordingly. CONCLUSION We conclude that the improvement unit mandating the paving of one block of Donna Street, which intersected Jean Drive, was plainly authorized by the second sentence of § 18-2001. We reverse the judgment of the district court and remand the cause with direction to enter judgment in favor of the City. R eversed and remanded with direction. 24 U.S. Bank Nat. Assn.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brandon v. County of RichardsonNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Doe v. Omaha Public School DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Fickle v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Cotton v. OstroskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Stacy v. GREAT LAKES AGRI MARKETING, INC.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Transcanada Keystone Pipeline, LP v. Dunavan (In Re Application No. Op-0003)Nebraska Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Amend v. Nebraska Pub. Serv. Comm.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Kimminau v. City of HastingsNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Hughes v. School Dist. of AuroraNebraska Supreme Court · 2015

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API