Sand-Blast File-Sharpening Co. v. Parsons
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Action of scire facias upon a foreign attachment; brought to the Superior Court in Fairfield County, and heard before Beardsley, J. Facts found and judgment rendered for the defendant, and appeal by the plaintiffs. The case is fully stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.
This is a complaint in scire facias upon a process of foreign attachment, alleging that, the defendant was indebted to one Ryan at the time the process in the original suit was served. The answer denies such indebtedness. The Superior Court found the issue for the defendant, and the plaintiff appealed.
In May, 1882, the defendant, who was the owner of a patented invention for sharpening files, constituted Ryan his agent on certain specified terms and within certain limits, to sell licenses and shop-rights to use the invention on the line of railroad companies. Ryan was not to collect or…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Michigan Chandelier Co. v. MorseMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Rumely v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- Coyne v. PlumeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Loewe v. Savings Bank of DanburyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
- Calechman v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.