Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 2006No. 23566PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEIERHENRY, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Defendant Gary Dean Williams (Williams) appeals from his conviction for three counts of grand theft by deception. Williams asserts that evidence was improperly admitted at his trial. He also asserts that his thirty-year sentence, with nine years suspended, constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. We affirm.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] The three counts of which Williams was convicted involved three different victims: Michael Crago (Crago), Michael and Cheryl Brimmer (the Brim-mers), and Gerald Heck (Heck). Crago and Williams, both hearing impaired, first became acquainted while…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. State v. PhippsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. BonnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. United States v. Wilbur HaleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  5. State v. GoodroadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. DuboisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Steichen v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. BrendeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. $1,010.00 IN AMERICAN CURRENCYSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. WilliamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API