Legal Opinion

Steichen v. Weber

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 2009No. 24844PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEIERHENRY, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Robert Steichen appeals the denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. Specifically, Steichen argues that the admission of SDCL 19-12-5 (Rule 404(b)) evidence of other acts violated his due process rights; that he had ineffective assistance of counsel, at trial; and that his sentences were grossly disproportionate. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

[¶ 2.] Steichen was convicted in 1997 of three counts of First-Degree Rape, seven counts of Third-Degree Rape, and one count of Sexual Contact with a Child under the Age of sixteen. The incidents alleged*386ly…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. BrimSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. ThomasSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. McDonough v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Piper v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. CraigSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API