Legal Opinion

Alfred Shrimpton & Sons v. Culver

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1896PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error to Calhoun; Smith, J. ‘ Trover by Alfred Shrimpton & Sons, Limited, against Allen M. Culver. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is an action of trover. The declaration contains two counts; the first charging the conversion of a check drawn by plaintiff to the order of defendant, and the second charging the conversion of the money, the proceeds of the check. The circuit judge directed a verdict for the defendant on the ground that the action of trover could not be maintained under the testimony.

The defendant is an attorney at law, residing at Albion, and the plaintiff’s home office is New York. Plaintiff had a claim against one Ella M. Crane, of Albion, and *578through their New York attorney, J. Sarsfield Roche,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. HanawMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Pierce v. UnderwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Davis v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Garras v. BekiaresMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Davin v. DowlingWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Lawson v. Commonwealth Land Title InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  4. V. P. Randolph & Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  5. Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API