Pierce v. Underwood
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Newaygo. (Palmer, J.) Trover. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
McGrath, 0. J.
Defendant, an attorney, was in February, 1890, employed by plaintiff in certain litigation then pending between herself and her husband, relating to a divorce, and also respecting a conveyance of land which was alleged to have been made in fraud of her rights. In June, 1890, he received from her $170, for which he gave her a receipt, as follows:
“This is to show that on the 9th day of June, 1890, I received from Polly Pierce $170, to be returned to her ■on demand.
“M. W. Underwood.”.In December, 1891, plaintiff brought trover for the •aforesaid moneys, claiming a conversion of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brink v. FreoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Robinson v. HawesMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Rall v. CookMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by12 opinions
- CAF Investment Co. v. Saginaw TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
- American Insurance v. MartinekMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Cones v. BrooksNebraska Supreme Court · 1900
- Kysor Industrial Corp. v. D. M. Liquidating Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Alfred Shrimpton & Sons v. CulverMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.