Legal Opinion
Paul Hardeman, Inc. v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided February 14, 1969No. 273-67PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION AND DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
2Opinion of the Court · CollinsCollins, Judge
This case comes before the court on the motion of plaintiff and on cross-motion of defendant for summary judgment, in review under the Wunderlich Act (41 U.S.C. §§ 321, 322 (1964)) of a decision of the Corps of Engineers Board of Contract Appeals. Both parties rely upon the administrative record and the pleadings filed in this court, and there is no dispute over the material facts. Both plaintiff and defendant agreed during oral argument that a decision for plaintiff in this court would necessitate returning the case to…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Blair Ex Rel. Roanoke Marble & Granite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Koppers Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Laburnum Construction Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- United States v. Howard P. Foley Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by29 opinions
- Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Electronic and Missile Facilities, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Essex Electro Engineers, Inc.,appellant v. Richard J. Danzig, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- G.M. Shupe, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- Marriott Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Dasta Construction Company, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.