Legal Opinion
In Re ClassicStar Mare Lease Litigation
United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation
Decided October 19, 2007No. MDL 1877PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TRANSFER ORDER
JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman.
Before the entire Panel: Defendants ClassicStar, LLC (ClassicStar) and GeoS-tar Corp. (Geostar) have moved, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, to centralize this litigation in the Eastern District of Kentucky. Defendants Karren, Hendrix, Stagg, Allen & Co., Terry L. Green, and GaStar Energy, Ltd. (GaStar) support the motion. Plaintiffs in all actions and three defendants 1 in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania action oppose centralization.
This litigation currently consists of seven actions listed on Schedule A and pending in four districts as follows:…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Prudential Ins. Co. of America Sales Pract.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2001
- In Re Smith Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1976
- In Re Acacia Media Technologies Corp. Patent LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2005
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re Watson Fentanyl Patch Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012
- In Re Zimmer Durom Hip Cup Products Liability LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2010
- In re Wright Medical Technology, Inc.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012
- In re Bank of New York Mellon Corp. Foreign Exchange Transactions LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2012
- In re McCormick & Co.United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.