Legal Opinion
In re Whirlpool Corp. Front-Loading Washer Products Liability Litigation
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided September 9, 2014No. 1:08-WP-65000; MDL No. 2001PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CHRISTOPHER A. BOYKO, District Judge:
On July 12, 2010, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(a) and 23(b)(3), this Court certified a lia*451bility-only class of Ohio Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs move to modify the class definition (docket no. 330), while Defendant Whirlpool objects and moves to decertify the Ohio class entirely (docket no. 327). For the reasons stated below, Plaintiffs’ motion is GRANTED in part and Whirlpool’s motion is DENIED. The Court hereby modifies the class definition and certifies the following liability-only class of Ohio Plaintiffs:1
All persons who are current…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Scottsdale Insurance v. FlowersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Durand v. Hanover Ins. Grp., Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2018
- In re Whirlpool Corp. Front-Loading Washer Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2014
- Maak v. IHC Health Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2016
- Anthony Roland v. Annett Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2020
- Eaton v. Ascent Resources-Utica, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.