Legal Opinion

King v. Bass

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 20, 1968No. 192PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants’ assignments of error include the following:

“1. The Court erred in failing to state anywhere in his charge to the jury that the burden of proof on all the issues was on the plaintiff.
“2. The Court erred in failing to charge concerning the second issue submitted to the jury that the burden of proof was on the plaintiff and the intensity of proof required.”

Plaintiff asserted the affirmative on all the issues presented, and the burden was on him to offer evidence in support of all essential and material elements of his cause of action. Bank v. Construction Co., 203 N.C. 100, 164 S.E.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Skyland Hosiery Co. v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Coach Co. v. . LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Queen City Coach Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. State v. FalknerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  5. Watt v. CrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Matter of RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Neugent v. Beroth Oil Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Bendorf v. Volkswagenwerk AktiengeselischaftNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Bendorf v. Volkswagenwerk AktiengeselischaftNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Foy v. BremsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API