Legal Opinion

Foy v. Bremson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 9, 1974No. 737SC729Published

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

This case must go back for a new trial on all issues. We do not discuss the error in admission and exclusion of evidence. Nor do we discuss all the errors in the charge because on retrial they may not recur. Although there are other prejudicial errors in the trial, one error in the charge is sufficiently prejudicial to require a new trial.

At the beginning of its charge, the court said “And, as to each issue, I’ll tell you which party has the burden of proof.” Only as to issue 5 — plaintiff’s contributory negligence — did the court do this.

In King v. Bass, 273 N.C. 353, 354, 160…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Skyland Hosiery Co. v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Watt v. CrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Crain v. . HutchinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. Duncan v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  5. Tippite v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API