Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (2005)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Decided August 30, 2005Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Representative Blackwell,

¶ 0 This office has received your request for an official Attorney General Opinion in which you ask, in effect, the following questions:

1. Does it constitute a violation of the statutory prohibition against dual office holding for a person to hold a position on the Governor's Cabinet and to be appointed to fill the unexpired term of the position of State Treasurer?

2. Under current law, does the State Treasurer have the authority to cause information to be prepared for consideration by the State Board of Equalization regarding financial and revenue information,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Marley v. CannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. Oklahoma City v. Century Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Smith Ex Rel. State v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  4. In Re Initiative Petition No. 364Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  5. Yetman v. NaumannCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API