Laurel National Bank v. Mutual Benefit Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WICKERSHAM, Judge:
The instant appeal arises from an order awarding appellant, Laurel National Bank (“Laurel Bank”), insurance coverage as mortgagee under one mortgage but denying it coverage on the same property and under the same policy under its second mortgage. Laurel Bank contends that both mortgages should be covered by the insurance policy and that the amount due under the policy should not be limited to its pre-foreclosure debt.
The following transactions occurred on November 28, 1975. Dorance L. Jensen and his wife, Mary L. Jensen, conveyed a parcel of land to H. Lynn Hale and Ann Hale…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Pauline Rosenbaum v. John Funcannon, as Administrator of the Estate of Martha A. Call, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. WilbornSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- Fort Scott Building & Loan Ass'n v. Palatine InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- Continental Ins. Co. of New York v. RotholzSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United Jersey Bank v. CS Associates (In Re CS Associates)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Loving v. Ponderosa Systems, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Ideal Financial Services, Inc. v. ZichelleMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
- Sotelo v. Washington Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Rollins v. BravosCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.