Legal Opinion

Sotelo v. Washington Mutual Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 24, 1999PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMILIA, J.:

¶ 1 This action involves cross-appeals from the judgment entered on July 20, 1998. Appellee/appellant, Carol Sotelo, held two mortgages on property insured by appellants/appellees, Washington Mutual Insurance Company and Everett Cash Mutual Insurance Company (hereinafter appellants). 1 When the property burned down, Sotelo sought to recover under the policy issued by appellants, and the parties now dispute the extent of Sotelo’s insurable interest and the amount due under the policy. Appellants claim the trial court erred by accepting in toto the valuation of the above property by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. General Electric Credit Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. Turney Media Fuel, Inc. v. Toll Bros., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Property Owners Insurance Co. v. HackIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Alberici v. Safeguard Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Broadcast Equities, Inc. v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Alcoa v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Aluminum Co. of America v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
  3. HENSLEY v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
  4. In Re BarronUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Alabama · 2005
  5. HENSLEY v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API