Legal Opinion

Natrona Power Co. v. Clark

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1924No. 1088PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kimball, Justice.

The plaintiff, Guy Clark, or G. C. Clark, an employee of the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company, was injured March 12, 1918 .by contact with an electric wire maintained by the Natrona Power Company above and across the tracks of the railroad company. On February 21, 1920, the plaintiff brought his action for damages against.the power company as the sole defendant. The answer of the defendant alleged, among other things, that *290the plaintiff had made claim against the railroad company for compensation for the injury and thereafter, on April 16, 1918, had received from…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. . FinchNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Dwy v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  3. Abb v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Matheson v. O'KaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  5. Nashville Interurban Ry. v. GregoryTennessee Supreme Court · 1916

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Gronquist v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Black v. MartinMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Road & Highway Builders, LLC v. Northern Nevada Rebar, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Pure Gas & Chemical Company v. CookWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Haderlie v. SondgerothWyoming Supreme Court · 1993

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API