Legal Opinion

People v. Holmes

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1990No. 68448PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark

The central question raised by this appeal is whether the State should be required to produce a government informant for trial where that informant’s testimony could undermine the State’s case against the defendant.

On November 6, 1986, defendant, Louis Holmes, was indicted in the circuit court of Knox County on two counts of unlawful delivery of cannabis (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 56V2, pars. 705(c), (d)). The first count alleged that defendant sold cannabis to a police officer named Carl Powell in the presence of a government informant named Wayne Lee on February 25, 1986. The second count…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. TsombanidisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  2. State v. Oliveria-CoutinhoNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
  3. People v. AbstonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  4. People v. IrbyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  5. People v. WoodsIllinois Supreme Court · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API