Legal Opinion

People v. Budd

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 22, 1979PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The question as to whether the People have exercised due diligence in their efforts to locate or produce an informant, whose testimony may be needed by the defendant at trial (People v Jenkins, 41 NY2d 307), is essentially factual. A determination of this nature, if affirmed by the intermediate appellate court, is beyond review in this court unless the evidence is insufficient, as a matter of law, to support the finding (cf. People v Oden, 36 NY2d 382).

Here the defendant argues that the police did not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. OdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. HarrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. People v. LuperonNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. People v. DiazNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. People v. WatsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  5. People v. ManeiroNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API