Legal Opinion

United States v. Gann

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided July 3, 1953No. 1425PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*13Opinion of the Court

Paul W. Brosman, Judge:

Here, following common trial by general court-martial, each of the two accused was convicted of desertion with intent to avoid hazardous duty1 and willful disobedience of the lawful order of a superior noncommissioned officer.2 Both alleged offenses were committed in Korea. The convening authority reduced the findings of guilty of desertion with intent to avoid hazardous duty to guilty of absence without leave,3 to which lesser offense each had pleaded guilty, affirmed the convictions of willful disobedience, and substantially reduced the sentences…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. LucasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1951
  2. United States v. ClarkUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  3. United States v. BancroftUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  4. United States v. WapplerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. EggersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  2. United States v. BancroftUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  3. United States v. BestUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  4. United States v. AyersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  5. United States v. ShellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API