New York State Public Employment Relations Board v. Board of Education
New York Court of Appeals
1Concurrence
Fuchsberg, J. (concurring).
We all agree that the ultimate disposition of this case in the court below ought to be affirmed. Under the statutory design pursuant to which the PERB acts, upon its finding that the employer has interfered with the employees’ exercise of their statutory rights (§ 209-a, subd 1, par [a]), it was fully authorized by section 205 (subd 5, par [d]) to require a return to the status quo, complete with back pay. PERB made such a finding here, and the question of whether it had substantial evidence for its determination or not is indeed foreclosed by the parties’ failure…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America v. BohlingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- City of Amsterdam v. HelsbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Foy v. SchechterNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Elwood Investors Co. v. BehmeNew York Supreme Court · 1974
- New York State Public Employment Relations Board v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975