Legal Opinion

City of Amsterdam v. Helsby

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1975PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJasen, J.

In 1974, the Legislature amended section 209 of the Civil Service Law so as to provide that disputes arising in the course of collective bargaining negotiations between a public employer and its firemen and policemen are to be submitted to an arbitration panel, established under the jurisdiction of the Public Employment Relations Board (hereinafter "PERB”), for compulsory and binding arbitration. In the first case now before us, City of Amsterdam v Helsby, the city *26and the collective bargaining representative for its policemen and firemen reached an impasse in their negotiations. The union…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Utica v. Water Pollution Control BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Martin v. State Liquor AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Chiropractic Ass'n of New York, Inc. v. HilleboeNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. Martin v. State Liquor AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. Matter of Osborn v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1936

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Kelley v. McGeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Jewish Reconstructionist Synagogue of North Shore, Inc. v. Incorporated Village of Roslyn HarborNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. City of Detroit v. Detroit Police Officers Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Town of Arlington v. Board of Conciliation & ArbitrationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  5. City of Spokane v. Spokane Police GuildWashington Supreme Court · 1976

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API