United States v. Joseph W. Hart and J. Carl Russell
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BOYD, District Judge.
The government sued the defendants-appellants herein for $83,900.63 plus interest, the balance allegedly owing on a loan contracted with two certain banking institutions, the payment of which the appellants had unconditionally guaranteed. The claim herein against the appellants had been assigned by the aforesaid banks to the government after the latter had paid on its own guaranty of 90% of the obligation. The government’s guaranty was executed pursuant to Executive Order 9112, U.S.Code Cong. Service 1942, p. 268, issued under authority of the First War Powers Act of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sharp v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Erceg v. Fairbanks Exploration Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
3Cited by7 opinions
- Liflans Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Joseph W. Hart, Luella F. Hart and J. Carl Russell v. The First National Bank of Birmingham, Birmingham, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967
- Ottenheimer Publishers, Inc. v. Regal Publishers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1981
- Hart v. Federal Reserve BankDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1966
- Joseph W. Hart, Luella F. Hart and J. Carl Russell v. Federal Reserve Bank of AtlantaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.