Legal Opinion
Hart v. Federal Reserve Bank
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided January 13, 1966No. Civ. No. 3337PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WILLIAM E. MILLER, Chief Judge.
This case is before the Court on a motion for summary judgment by defendant, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta. The specific points raised and pleaded in the motion are that (1) plaintiff, Luella F. Hart, is not a proper party plaintiff '; (2) the questions now presented have been previously decided and .that this action is therefore barred under the doctrine of res judicata; (3) the action is barred by laches and the statute of limitations; and (4) the action will not lie because of the doctrine of sovereign immunity.
In 1943, in order to finance a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. Joseph W. Hart and J. Carl RussellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
- United States v. HartDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1962
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Cleveland v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1980
- Joseph W. Hart, Luella F. Hart and J. Carl Russell v. Federal Reserve Bank of AtlantaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
- United States v. Stauffer Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Stauffer Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982