Legal Opinion

Loveland v. Nelson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1926No. Docket Nos. 19, 20PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

These cases were tried together and were submitted in this court on one record and will be disposed of in one opinion. Both plaintiffs were office employees at the Detroit Graphite Company’s office in Detroit. Each wanted a wisdom tooth extracted. They went together at the noon hour to the office of defendant, a dentist in general practice. Miss Allen occupied the operating chair first. When the defendant injected the supposed anaesthetic fluid into the gum, she experienced a burning sensation which extended into her throat. It is her claim that the injection did not deaden the pain. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burghardt v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Wood v. VromanMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Marx v. SchultzMichigan Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Whetstine v. MoravecSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  2. Torma v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Becker v. EisenstodtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  4. Barnes v. MitchellMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Davis v. New York Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1957

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API