Legal Opinion

Zion's Sav. Bank & Trust Co. v. Tropic & East Fork Irr. Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1942No. 6425PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVERICH, District Judge.

Appellant Bank, as trustee of the beneficiaries under a certain trust agreement, sued the respondent upon a promissory note and appeals from an adverse judgment. Appeal is on the judgment roll.

At the conclusion of the trial by jury, the court first directed a verdict for the Bank and judgment was entered thereon against the Irrigation Company for $3,504.77 owing on the note.

Thereafter the Irrigation Company moved for a new trial. At the hearing on that motion, the court declared it was of the opinion it had erred and should have directed a verdict for the defendant.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. North Point Consolidated Irrigation Co. v. Utah & Salt Lake Canal Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1898
  3. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Cascade Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Millett v. MacKie Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Tracy Loan & Trust Co. v. Merchants' BankUtah Supreme Court · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Park v. ALTA DITCH & CANAL COMPANYUtah Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Trustees, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Summit Range & Livestock Co. v. ReesUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Latimer v. HolladayUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Uhlmann v. WrenArizona Supreme Court · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API