Legal Opinion

Concrete Mix, Inc. v. JAMES

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 1, 1957No. 17317PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stukes, Chief Justice.

This is an action for goods sold and delivered, in which there was jury verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $991-.50. Ready-mixed concrete constituted the “goods” and was manufactured at plaintiff’s plant in Rockingham, North Carolina, and delivered to a construction project of the defendants at Cheraw, South Carolina. It was alleged in the complaint that the defendant James is a resident of Horry County of this State and the defendant McBride is a resident of Cheraw; and that they are partners and doing business under the name and style of James Realty Company in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Snipes v. Augusta-Aiken Ry. & Electric Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
  2. Brevard v. FORTUNESupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
  3. Martin v. FowlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1897
  4. Goudelock v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  5. Grand Piano Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hewitt v. Reserve Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
  2. City of Columbia v. BarrSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  3. Van Dolson v. EarlesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
  4. Hicks v. GilesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API