Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Giles

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 6, 1962No. 17963PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bussey, Justice.

The plaintiff-respondent in this action seeks to recover certain moneys from the defendant-appellant based upon a sharecropping agreement between the parties, the plaintiff being the owner of the land and the defendant the sharecropper, and plaintiff’s farm being adjacent to a farm owned by the defendant. The complaint alleges three causes of action ; the first for the recovery of half of the expenses of the farming operation; in the second, the plaintiff seeks to recover for half of the expenditures made by him in connection with the feeding and caring for an intermingled…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Evatt v. CampbellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
  2. Garlington v. CopelandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1890
  3. Alamance Industries v. Chesterfield Hosiery MillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  4. Concrete Mix, Inc. v. JAMESSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  5. De Hihns v. FreeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. SEA PINES PLANTATION COMPANY v. WellsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  2. Kirven v. LawrenceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API