Legal Opinion

Martin v. Fowler

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 22, 1897PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Motion in this Court by the appellant, in the case of F. and R. M. Martin, as administrators of Othello Martin, respondents, against James Fowler, appellant.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice McIver.

This was a motion: “First, for an order suspending the hearing of the appeal herein, and giving the defendant, appellant, leave to move the Court of Common Pleas for Spartanburg County for an order vacating and setting aside the judgment herein appealed from, and for a new trial, with leave to defendant to amend his answer by withdrawing his admission of the fourth paragraph of the complaint, and denying the same, on the ground that the plaintiffs, F. and R. M. Martin, were not the duly appointed administrators of the estate of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. JohnstonTennessee Supreme Court · 1847

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jennings v. McCowanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  2. Furman v. A. C. Tuxbury Land & Timber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1919
  3. Coburn v. ColemanDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1947
  4. Scruggs v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1970
  5. Pickett v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1906

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API