Legal Opinion

Berry v. G. D. Searle & Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1974No. 44845PublishedCited by 183 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kluczynski

On May 29, 1969, plaintiffs, Martha Berry and her husband, filed a complaint in the circuit court of Cook County which was thereafter amended. In a second amended complaint Martha Berry (hereafter referred to as plaintiff) sought damages for injuries allegedly sustained by her after having taken a birth-control pill commonly known as Enovid. This drug was manufactured by defendant G. D. Searle & Co. (hereafter Searle), and prescribed and sold to her on and before May 29, 1965, by the co-defendant, Planned Parenthood Association of Chicago (hereafter Association). The initial action was filed…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Rozny v. MarnulIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Williams v. Brown Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Heavner v. Uniroyal, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  5. Kassab v. SoyaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by183 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. A, C and S, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Nolan v. Johns-Manville AsbestosIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Witherell v. WeimerIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Tom Olesker's Exciting World of Fashion, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Woodill v. Parke Davis & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980

178 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API