Legal Opinion

Hocking v. Insurance Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1897PublishedCited by 6 opinions

PROM KNOX. Appeal from Chancery Court of Knox County. H. B. Lindsay, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtBeard, J.

This bill is filed by Yiola Hocking and her husband, who sue in their own right, and for the use of J. E. Hancock, to recover on a,policy of fire insurance, issued by the defendant company to, and upon the application of, Viola Hocking, upon *730her dwelling house, the policy reciting in its face that ‘ ‘ the loss, if any, was payable to J. E. Hancock as his interest may appear.” The property covered by this policy was destroyed by fire during its life, and the question here presented is, can a recovery be made for the use and benefit of Hancock, the mortgagee, when the record discloses, beyond…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grosvenor v. . the Atlantic Fire Insurance Co. of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Donaldson v. Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Illinois Mutual Fire Insurance v. FixIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Farmers' & Millers' Bank of Milwaukee v. Detroit & Milwaukee RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Girard Et Ux. v. Vt. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1931
  3. Central National Insurance Co. of Omaha v. Manufacturers Acceptance Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Reeves v. Granite State Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Pactech, Inc. v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API