Attorney Grievance Commission v. Singleton
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Chief Judge.
The Attorney Grievance Commission, acting through Bar Counsel, filed a petition for disciplinary action against Herbert Louis Singleton, Jr., alleging violations of the disciplinary rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility. We referred the matter, pursuant to Maryland Rule BV9 b, to Judge Thomas Ward of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City to make findings of fact and conclusions of law. After conducting a hearing upon an agreed statement of facts, Judge Ward filed detailed findings and conclusions as follows:
“A first and only charge of misconduct against the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. VelasquezCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. MoreheadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SingletonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
3Cited by6 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. HodesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GoodmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Advance Finance Co. v. Trustees of Clients' Security Trust Fund of BarCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SingletonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. BakasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.