Legal Opinion
City of Reno v. Fields
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided November 13, 1952No. 3709PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Badt, C. J.:
William E. Fields and Phyllis H. Fields, his wife, own residential property east of the city dump maintained by the city of Reno, and they sought an injunction against the operation and maintenance of such dump as a nuisance and for resulting damages. They attached to their amended complaint a copy of their claim for such damages theretofore presented to the city. Such claim recited the plaintiffs’ ownership of the property described in detail, alleged the ownership by the city of certain lands in the same section of land and alleged that the city, since…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Friederichsen v. RenardSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Weyant v. Utah Savings & Trust Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1919
- Frasier v. Cowlitz CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Coen v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Cook v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bankers Trust Company, a Corporation v. Pacific Employers Insurance Company, a Corporation, and the Century Insurance Company, Limited, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- State v. WebsterNevada Supreme Court · 1972
- Rogers v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1969
- Hansen-Neiderhauser, Inc. v. Nevada State Tax CommissionNevada Supreme Court · 1965
- Zalk-Josephs Co. v. Wells Cargo, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.