Destec Energy, Inc. v. Houston Lighting & Power Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Justice.
Appellants Destec Energy, Inc., Destec Operating Company, Cogen Lyondell, Inc., and Lyondell Petrochemical Company (collectively “appellants”) challenge the trial-court judgment in favor of Houston Lighting & Power Company (“HL & P”). The court ruled that appellants could not avoid the requirement of obtaining a certificate of convenience and necessity (“CCN”) before generating and distributing electricity as planned. In seven points of error, appellants challenge various findings and conclusions of the trial court. We will affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In 1994,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Havner v. E-Z Mart Stores, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
- Lawler v. Dallas Statler-Hilton Joint Venture, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
- Holmes v. MoralesTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Texarkana Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. MurdockTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Public Utility Com'n of Texas v. CoferTexas Supreme Court · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re Allcat Claims Service, L.P. and John WeaklyTexas Supreme Court · 2011
- Grocers Supply Co., Inc. v. Sharp, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
- Oram v. State Farm Lloyds, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
- Fetter v. Wells Fargo Bank Texas, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
- Rent-A-Center, Inc. v. HegarCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.