Legal Opinion
United States v. Nix
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided August 21, 2017No. 6:14-CR-06181 EAWPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge
Over four months after a jury was selected and three months after that jury *431convicted defendants Matthew Nix and Earl McCoy (collectively, “Defendants”) of all counts in the Third Superseding Indictment, they have filed a motion challenging the jury selection process. Defendants argue that the prospective jurors summoned in their case did not represent a fair cross-section of the community because they included only three African American individuals, only one of whom was qualified to serve as a juror.
Defendants seek the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Shotwell Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gratton Earl Moore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Demetrius Hill v. Al Tisch, et al.District Court, E.D. New York · 2025