Legal Opinion

Gimbel v. Signal Companies, Inc.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided January 10, 1974PublishedCited by 114 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUILLEN, Chancellor:

This action was commenced on December 24, 1973 by plaintiff, a stockholder of the Signal Companies, Inc. (“Signal”). The complaint seeks, among other things, injunctive relief to prevent the consummation of the pending sale by Signal to Bur-mah Oil Incorporated (“Burmah”) of all of the outstanding capital stock of Signal Oil and Gas Company (“Signal Oil”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Signal. The effective sale price exceeds 480 million dollars. 1 The sale was approved at a special meeting of the Board of Directors of Signal held on December21, 1973.

The agreement provides…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Sinclair Oil Corporation v. LevienSupreme Court of Delaware · 1971
  3. Pauley Petroleum Inc. v. Continental Oil CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
  4. Allied Chemical & Dye Corp. v. Steel & Tube Co. of AmericaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
  5. Allied Chemical & Dye Corp. v. Steel & Tube Co. of AmericaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1923

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by114 opinions

  1. Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  2. Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
  3. Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1986
  4. In Re Walt Disney Co. Derivative LitigationSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  5. Smith v. Van GorkomSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985

109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API