Gimbel v. Signal Companies, Inc.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
QUILLEN, Chancellor:
This action was commenced on December 24, 1973 by plaintiff, a stockholder of the Signal Companies, Inc. (“Signal”). The complaint seeks, among other things, injunctive relief to prevent the consummation of the pending sale by Signal to Bur-mah Oil Incorporated (“Burmah”) of all of the outstanding capital stock of Signal Oil and Gas Company (“Signal Oil”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Signal. The effective sale price exceeds 480 million dollars. 1 The sale was approved at a special meeting of the Board of Directors of Signal held on December21, 1973.
The agreement provides…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Sinclair Oil Corporation v. LevienSupreme Court of Delaware · 1971
- Pauley Petroleum Inc. v. Continental Oil CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
- Allied Chemical & Dye Corp. v. Steel & Tube Co. of AmericaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
- Allied Chemical & Dye Corp. v. Steel & Tube Co. of AmericaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by114 opinions
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1986
- In Re Walt Disney Co. Derivative LitigationSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- Smith v. Van GorkomSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985
109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.