Legal Opinion
Wetsel v. Guaranteed Mortgage Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 29, 1935No. 29,817PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hilton, Justice.
Plaintiffs sought to have a loan made, by them of defendants declared null and void as usurious. This is an appeal from a judgment and decree in favor of defendants.
On April 23, 1927, plaintiffs, owners as joint tenants, of a four-plex apartment building, with the lots upon which it stood, in the city of Minneapolis, made a written application to the White-Price Company, a corporation, to secure for them a loan of $15,000. The White-Price Company submitted the application to the defendant Guaranteed Mortgage" Company, a corporation. The loan was made by the latter concern, and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Geib v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Smith v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Lassman v. JacobsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Patterson v. WymanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Combination Steel & Iron Co. v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rathbun v. WT Grant CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Midland Loan Finance Co. v. LorentzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Dietz v. Phipps (In Re Sunde)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
- Trapp v. HancuhCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Farrell v. Wurm (In Re Donnay)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.