Legal Opinion · Dissent

Citizens State Bank v. Raven Trading Partners, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 22, 2010No. A08-1560Published

1DissentPage, Justice

The court’s decision rests on the notion that “equity aids the vigilant, and not the negligent,” and therefore Citizens’ failure to act for 38 days in resubmitting the mortgage registration tax does not warrant equitable subrogation. However, in our over-century-long application of equitable subrogation we have faced far more egregious conduct and have never found a mistake so unjustifiable or so inexcusable that equitable subrogation should not apply. I would hold that the district court did not clearly abuse its discretion when it applied equitable subrogation to Citizens’ mortgage.

Most…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Turner v. Alpha Phi Sorority HouseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Marriage of Pikula v. PikulaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Marriage of Sefkow v. SefkowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. In Re the Welfare of M.D.O.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  5. Northern Trust Co. v. Consolidated Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API